|
Post by LUX on Feb 21, 2016 3:31:36 GMT -5
I think it would be nice if an evaluation form was sent out to the members like I previously had us do once before, I think it was really an eye-opener and even helped to show the admins some things they might want to keep an eye on or possibly even improve on. I think this would also help let the users know that the admins really do care for their members and want to know what they can do to make the site a better place. No specific names would have to be on the form, it would be just an overall evaluation for the admins.
I'd love to hear other members input on this to see if they also like the idea of this!
|
|
Matured Feline
162 posts
Gender:
D00d
|
Post by REYES ♕ on Feb 23, 2016 3:35:48 GMT -5
1+ I'm down for this.
|
|
Ancient Battle Cat
1,211 posts
Avatar:
myg
|
Post by HolyKitten on Feb 23, 2016 8:39:24 GMT -5
Sounds neat. I think this would be interesting.
|
|
Withered Pile o' Fur
2,538 posts
|
Post by Lysandre on Feb 23, 2016 13:26:55 GMT -5
The only concern I have about this is that it could be biased? A user that is a trouble maker might pretend like it's the admin's fault they were banned, while others might kiss up in the hope to get on an admin's good side.
I'm sure the team would be able to tell the difference from false and true, though.
|
|
Ancient Battle Cat
1,211 posts
Avatar:
myg
|
Post by HolyKitten on Feb 23, 2016 16:24:41 GMT -5
I agree that could be a problem, and some users who favor specific admins more than others could be a possibility as well. But yeah I think it would be easy to tell.
|
|
Matured Feline
162 posts
Gender:
D00d
|
Post by REYES ♕ on Feb 27, 2016 8:09:55 GMT -5
If it was the admin team as a whole that users were evaluating, you wouldn't be able to pick out certain admins.
|
|
|
Post by LUX on Feb 27, 2016 21:12:27 GMT -5
Lysandre - Exactly what Hibiya said! Which is what I stated in the original post, it would be an overall admin evaluation, not indivuals. c: Also the point of the evaluation is to say both positive AND negative things about the team, therefore, there wouldnt be much of a bias since in the evaluation you would have a chance to say something positive, plus I dont think bias come into play here in any regard, for the fact that if someone doesnt say any criticism toward the team because they want to kiss up, then thats their problem, it wont affect anything, it just wont help let the admins know some things they can work on, while others might give criticisms and thats all good. Plus I thought that the evaluation would be made on a separate site where users could go and write up anonymous answers, like we did before, and that would completely eliminate the bias altogether.
|
|
Withered Pile o' Fur
2,538 posts
|
Post by Lysandre on Feb 28, 2016 8:44:41 GMT -5
Ohhh sorry I missed that part because I quickly read the post while I was in class lmao.
Even if it isn't singling out a certain admin, I still have a feeling that some are going to take advantage and write a nasty report just because they were banned or warned at a certain time. But, just like I said before, the team could most likely differentiate an honest report from a fake one.
Ultimately, this would be up to the Alphas though, so we have to see what they think.
|
|
|
Post by LUX on Feb 28, 2016 11:23:57 GMT -5
Lysandre - I guess I am not seeing this the same way as you are because in any kind of situation, you are always going to have a few of those people, its kind of inevitable I guess(?) But why let those small few people keep you all from doing something that could be really beneficial to your team, and I agree, Im pretty sure you all could tell what is an honest and fake report. Plus, as I saw when this was done previously, you see a pattern, meaning normally a bunch of people will discuss the same criticism, and that is what you normally can tell is the big concern with the users, which is mostly what I was meaning. If only a few people are giving different criticisms from the big whole of people due to their being banned or warned, you know that this is not a big concern and can be seen as more of that users very personally problems. Id appreciate if you could bring it up with the Alphas, I really do think this could really benefit you all, you might be missing out on an opportunity here.
|
|
Warrior
776 posts
Gender:
She/Her
|
Post by Indigo on Feb 28, 2016 11:49:48 GMT -5
Lysandre LUXI'm in somewhat agreement with both of you. Evaluation of the admin team would indeed be beneficial because it's always good to get feedback, however, pretty much any open ended question with a full text field would undoubtedly invite singling-out or bashing. ESPECIALLY right now with some people upset about the glitch. This IS a legitimate concern. To make that kind of thing work there would need to be: 1. A warning against admin bashing because that gets us nowhere 2. Questions about the general relationship between mods, the site, and the users that remain positive and reflective. i.e. "Do you feel that CPI is a community?" "How can admins connect with users better?" not "What is the admin team doing wrong?" "or "What bothers you most about the admin team?" Jäger Sif @nolani AutumnRain
|
|
Literally Really Old
1,728 posts
Gender:
nonbinary
|
Post by Hideyoshi on Feb 28, 2016 14:41:21 GMT -5
2. Questions about the general relationship between mods, the site, and the users that remain positive and reflective. i.e. "Do you feel that CPI is a community?" "How can admins connect with users better?" not "What is the admin team doing wrong?" "or "What bothers you most about the admin team?" Jäger Sif @nolani AutumnRainagreed on the questions!! "what is admin team doing wrong?" is somewhat of a harsh question and is open to bashing almost instantly.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 29, 2016 1:15:01 GMT -5
What if we set up a survey so that results weren't published for the world to see? We get what we need - the information - and they don't get all gang-y. After all, if a user has a serious concern about any staff member, they are more than welcome to take it up with Jager himself.
|
|
Warrior
776 posts
Gender:
She/Her
|
Post by Indigo on Feb 29, 2016 12:52:44 GMT -5
What if we set up a survey so that results weren't published for the world to see? We get what we need - the information - and they don't get all gang-y. After all, if a user has a serious concern about any staff member, they are more than welcome to take it up with Jager himself. I'm for this.
|
|
Ancient Battle Cat
1,211 posts
Avatar:
myg
|
Post by HolyKitten on Feb 29, 2016 16:18:09 GMT -5
I agree with the anonymous answers.
|
|
Warrior
817 posts
Gender:
Agender, they/them pronouns.
|
Post by Jäger on Feb 29, 2016 20:06:23 GMT -5
shrugs. I don't particularly care for these kinds of things but do whatever.
|
|